Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Half Title -- Title -- Copyright -- Table of Contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- 1 Jung and race -- 2 Jung and the Nazi era -- 3 Jung and the sociology of religion -- 4 Sociology and the city: Jung and "mass society -- 5 Jung, Lorenz and sociological theory -- 6 Jung and the sociology of gender -- 7 Jung, ecology and sociological theory -- Index.

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Note on Translations -- Three Orientations -- One. The Sublime Perversion of Capital -- Two. The Feudal Remnant and the Historical Outside -- Three. Primitive Accumulation, or the Logic of Origin -- Four. Labor Power: Capital's Threshold -- Five. The Continent of History and the Theoretical Inside -- Six. "The Ready- Made World of Capital" -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index

In The Sublime Perversion of Capital Gavin Walker examines the Japanese debate about capitalism between the 1920s and 1950s, using it as a ""prehistory"" to consider current problems of uneven economic development and contemporary topics in Marxist theory and historiography.

AbstractThe debate around labour power, and particularly regarding its status as the 'most peculiar' of commodities, has been widely revisited in contemporary Marxist thought and critical theory. This concept, which has often resurfaced in works by Negri, Spivak, Virno and numerous other contemporary thinkers, has a long prehistory in the work of Marx and subsequent Marxist theorists, perhaps most importantly in the work of Uno Kōzō, arguably the most influential and widely known Marxist thinker in modern Japan. Uno's work, and particularly his major theoretical works of the 1950s, developed an entirelogicalanalysis of the peculiar position of the labour-power commodity within capital's drive, noting that this site marks the place wherein capital'slogical interiorand itshistorical exteriorinterpenetrate each other, generating a volatile force of excess at the core of capital's supposedly smooth and pure circuit-process. By developing around this point an extensive theoretical discussion of its dynamics ofimpossibilityorirrationality, centred on a term –muri– that he raises to the level of a concept, Uno formulates a series of original theses in methodology, on the concept of population, and particularly around the figures of thelogicaland thehistoricalin the critical analysis of capitalism. Focusing in particular on this 'impossibility' ormurithat is nevertheless constantly 'passing through' the capital-relation, this essay investigates the entire range of Uno's analysis, revealing not only a crucial thread of theoretical inquiry that remains contemporary for us today, but also another set of possibilities linking the critique of political economy to the renewal of revolutionary politics.

The work of Étienne Balibar has long emphasized the link between the juridico-political forms of citizenship and subjectivity implied by the transition to a world order of "bourgeois universalism," while also linking the emergence of the nation-form and accompanying regime of "anthropological difference" to the specific concerns of the Marxian critique of political economy. Taking a series of clues from the entire range of Balibar's work, this essay reinvestigates the centrality of the national question to the capital-relation itself, particularly around the problem of the labor power commodity.

AbstractAlain Badiou's theoretical work maintains an ambiguous relation to Marx's critique of political economy. In seemingly refusing the Marxian analytical strategy of displacement and referral across the fields of politics and economy, Badiou is frequently seen to be lacking a rigorous theoretical grasp of capitalism itself. In turn, this is often seen as a consequence of his understanding of political subjectivity. But the origins of this 'lack' of analysis of the social relation called 'capital' in his work can also be investigated by means of a detour into the economic writings of theUnion des communistes de France marxiste-léniniste, the political organisation in which Badiou played a leading rôle throughout the 1970s in particular. By excavating this theoretical work of the 1970s, we can identify more precisely the historical and political reasons behind Badiou's ambiguous relation to Marx and specifically to Marx's systematic grasp of the logic of capital. This excavation will consequently lead us to a reflection on the limits and openings in Badiou's thought for the Marxian critique of political economy.

"In this new volume, Gavin Walker attempts to open a conversation between sociology and Jungian psychology, both often overlooked by each other, through a series of wide-ranging essays. This book provides a Jungian counterpoint to the more accepted Freudian perspective in sociology by engaging with several key themes, including race, gender, urban sociology, religion and the environment. The chapters here consider methodological issues, such as how Jungian psychology might contribute to our understanding of human nature, and Jung's - and sociology's - complex and many-levelled relationship with anthropology. As a whole this unique work provides an open-ended exploration of what sociology includes and excludes from its agenda, and asks how engagement with Jung might shift the center of gravity of a heterogeneous discipline. Psyche, Science and Society will be of interest to academics and students working in the fields of analytical psychology and sociology, as well as psychoanalysis, anthropology, feminism, environmentalism, comparative religion and the history of science"--

"In this new volume, Gavin Walker attempts to open a conversation between sociology and Jungian psychology, both often overlooked by each other, through a series of wide-ranging essays. This book provides a Jungian counterpoint to the more accepted Freudian perspective in sociology by engaging with several key themes, including race, gender, urban sociology, religion and the environment. The chapters here consider methodological issues, such as how Jungian psychology might contribute to our understanding of human nature, and Jung's - and sociology's - complex and many-levelled relationship with anthropology. As a whole this unique work provides an open-ended exploration of what sociology includes and excludes from its agenda, and asks how engagement with Jung might shift the center of gravity of a heterogeneous discipline. Psyche, Science and Society will be of interest to academics and students working in the fields of analytical psychology and sociology, as well as psychoanalysis, anthropology, feminism, environmentalism, comparative religion and the history of science"--